is it safe to undervolt the cpu, and if so how much. i want to undervolt but not underclock. would i get the same performance with the lower voltage and same clock speed?i am hoping to achieve the same performance with less power and lower temps. will this work? tell me what you think.
sure, np!
if u undervolt ur system too much, it will hang up, but it wont damage ur cpu.
try to find out, the minimal, stable vid.
greetings!
if u undervolt ur system too much, it will hang up, but it wont damage ur cpu.
try to find out, the minimal, stable vid.
greetings!
thanks. i've heard mixed answers so i wasnt sure what to do. hopefully when i get the time i can play around a little bit and find my systems minimum voltage.
Undervolting is harmless to the CPU as the manufacturers undervolt almost all CPUs on a routine basis- it's the part of Cool 'n Quiet/Intel Enhanced SpeedStep that does the most to quash heat production and power draw. CPU makers also undervolt specific lines of CPUs, such as AMD's Turion 64 MT series, Athlon 64 & X2 Energy Efficient, and the Opteron HE line. Intel undervolts the Pentium M LV & ULV, Core Solo/Duo LV/ULV, Xeon LV, and Core 2 Duo LV and ULV.
The only risk that you run in undervolting is an unstable system because you are in effect overclocking the CPU for that particular voltage. If you undervolt too far, your system will lock up and you'll need to restart. I *highly* suggest using a software tool that modifies the EIST/CnQ voltage tables instead of setting a Vcore in the BIOS. There are two reasons: one is that setting a Vcore in the BIOS generally disables CnQ/EIST and the second is that you don't have to jumper the CMOS clear pins and reset the BIOS if the Vcore is too low to enter BIOS successfully. If you lock it up using software, a reboot will simply boot the CPU with the normal Vcore and it will be sure to boot. Plus, some boards like my abit KN8-SLi do not support setting a Vcore lower than the default top-speed Vcore in the BIOS, so I have to use software. The only advantage to a BIOS undervolt is that the software tools will generally refuse to undervolt the CPU beyond what the lowest Vcore for the lowest frequency supported is in the best-case scenario. Those values for Intel chips can be found in the min/max tables for electricals in the CPU's datasheet from intel.com. AMD chips have a similar restriction but AMD is usually behind Intel in publishing CPU information so the data for any 65 nm and mobile CPUs is missing as of the moment. Suffice to say that Core 2 Duo mobile chips cannot be taken below 0.925 V and AMD 90 nm desktop chips bottom out at 1.100 V.
I undervolt my X2 4200+ 0.100 volt at top speed, from 1.350 V to 1.250 V. It runs rock-solid stable and puts out significantly less heat- often about 7 deg C less at my current fan speeds. The idle voltage is not able to be lowered from 1.100 V, such as I noted before. I use the CPU Power application (cpupw) but that's a Linux program and does not work with Windows. I believe that RMClock is the correct Windows tool to use; ask the Windows forum guys what they use.
The only risk that you run in undervolting is an unstable system because you are in effect overclocking the CPU for that particular voltage. If you undervolt too far, your system will lock up and you'll need to restart. I *highly* suggest using a software tool that modifies the EIST/CnQ voltage tables instead of setting a Vcore in the BIOS. There are two reasons: one is that setting a Vcore in the BIOS generally disables CnQ/EIST and the second is that you don't have to jumper the CMOS clear pins and reset the BIOS if the Vcore is too low to enter BIOS successfully. If you lock it up using software, a reboot will simply boot the CPU with the normal Vcore and it will be sure to boot. Plus, some boards like my abit KN8-SLi do not support setting a Vcore lower than the default top-speed Vcore in the BIOS, so I have to use software. The only advantage to a BIOS undervolt is that the software tools will generally refuse to undervolt the CPU beyond what the lowest Vcore for the lowest frequency supported is in the best-case scenario. Those values for Intel chips can be found in the min/max tables for electricals in the CPU's datasheet from intel.com. AMD chips have a similar restriction but AMD is usually behind Intel in publishing CPU information so the data for any 65 nm and mobile CPUs is missing as of the moment. Suffice to say that Core 2 Duo mobile chips cannot be taken below 0.925 V and AMD 90 nm desktop chips bottom out at 1.100 V.
I undervolt my X2 4200+ 0.100 volt at top speed, from 1.350 V to 1.250 V. It runs rock-solid stable and puts out significantly less heat- often about 7 deg C less at my current fan speeds. The idle voltage is not able to be lowered from 1.100 V, such as I noted before. I use the CPU Power application (cpupw) but that's a Linux program and does not work with Windows. I believe that RMClock is the correct Windows tool to use; ask the Windows forum guys what they use.
thanks for that. i'll prolly adjust the vcore just because i dont use CnQ and if it doesnt post i dont mind clearing the cmos. thanks for the advice tho. i'll keep that in mind in the future when i have a nicer rig and dont feel like moving jumpers around. right now i just want to get the experience in when it comes to screwing things up. i havent done it enough so there is much to learn.
Undervolting is safe and I have undervolted my AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52 using RM clock. Mine is working fine now with less temperature...Max it goes upto 53-54 degree
FID VID
4.0X 0.7125
5.0X 0.7500
6.0X 0.8000
7.0X 0.8250
8.0X 0.8750
FID VID
4.0X 0.7125
5.0X 0.7500
6.0X 0.8000
7.0X 0.8250
8.0X 0.8750
Undervolting without underclocking is dangerous because the voltages are there for a reason.... and if you CPU ever hits a heavy load then you'll hang up and possible die.
Nice 2 year bump there.
I've been using my Athlon X2 BE-2400 at 0.9v for two years. If that's not safe, I don't know what is (running at 2.3Ghz).
im runing win7 x64 ultimate on a x2 4200+. the fan is now running at around 2200rot/min. when i was a single core there were 1000+rot/min so the noise difference is remarkable.
managed to get the x2 4200+ from default 1,1/1,25 to 0,8/1,0. now the idle fan speed went to 1050rot/min which is better. under load on default it was going to 43+C. now it is doing 36C which is phenomenal.
i managed to undervold the ilde with 0,3v and the load with 0,15v which is actually astounding and has a great impact on heat and noise and i'm sure on power usage also. so not only undervolting is safe but is as far as i see it... recomended.
managed to get the x2 4200+ from default 1,1/1,25 to 0,8/1,0. now the idle fan speed went to 1050rot/min which is better. under load on default it was going to 43+C. now it is doing 36C which is phenomenal.
i managed to undervold the ilde with 0,3v and the load with 0,15v which is actually astounding and has a great impact on heat and noise and i'm sure on power usage also. so not only undervolting is safe but is as far as i see it... recomended.